 mud architecture.pdf (Size: 5.33 MB / Downloads: 75) Introduction Mud has been the most essential of building materials since the dawn of the man. Nature set the example: termites built tower above ground and developed air circulation which prefigured modern ventilation processes; the ‘potter’ wasp and its cousin the ‘mud-mixer’ wasp used their mandible to knead and model vaults that were perfectly rounded, as if designed by architects. From the earliest times men followed this example, he built dwellings, be they humble or elaborate, with materials that were closets at hand: out of fibers, leaves, stone or unbaked –‘sun dried’ –mud . Know –how was acquired and passed down. But, with the onset of the industrial revolution, bricks of baked clay and mass –produced materials such as cement, steel and glass gradually supplanted the basic elements of traditional construction. The development of transportation made it possible to bring building material from far away; while the use of modern components and specialized construction techniques brought about the loss of craftsmanship and art that had given each locale its sense of place. As the technical as well as the cultural roots of traditional architecture began to die out, the very shapes of buildings were transformed. But this trend cannot disguise the fact that unbaked mud is still the most viable building material for one –third of the world’s population-predominantly the poor who remain on the side-lines of money –economy that depends on manufactured materials. Furthermore, building with mud has become an important factor in planning new development. Following the recent energy crises, technological progress has been made in certain countries, and the enthusiasm of architects and land developers has aided in the spread of these new techniques. Today we are able to choose between conventional ‘international architecture’ and a more ‘down to earth’ approach that combines reasonable cost with traditional cultural motifs in a modern way. But only people who live with the problem of hosing can make this choice, because they are the only ones who can create their way of life and decide how to project it through architecture. The day is coming when architecture will be for living, and not merely a spectator sport. Ruins, Restorations and Rushes Over one-third of the world’s population lives in mud houses, and this traditional construction method continues to thrive in most of the Third World. For modern Western technology has failed both financially and socially, to satisfy the increasing demand for cheap housing. In countries recently enriched by oil, these traditions have tended suddenly to disappear as happened in Europe during the 1930s and 1950s. They are nowadays- as then- replaced by architectural forms and technologies, which are considered to be indicative of social advancement, even though they are notoriously ill adapted to local climatic conditions. But the tide is changing, and since 1972 in the American Southwest groups of enthusiasts have brought about a revival of earth architecture for both communal and domestic uses. We are now, therefore, witnessing a series of simultaneous but discordant phenomena; in some regions of the world the architectural heritage is being abandoned or dying out, while in other countries earth buildings are now prized as important examples of universal wisdom, and are listed, restored and protected. In addition, universities, academies and international institutions are attempting to forge a productive link between traditions and modernity. However, this enthusiasm sometimes leads to leads to the wildest parodies, committed by those hoping for quick profits. Some are not constructed in unbaked earth at all, and are perversions that betray the very spirit and nature of earth architecture, which, thanks to popular traditions, has always been able to suit an entire spectrum of differing circumstance History Ever since mankind first congregated in villages almost 10,000 years ago, unbaked mud has been one of the principal building materials used in every continent. Over one third of the world’s population still lives in mud houses today. In ancient times, unbaked mud was widely used in Mesopotamia and Egypt, while later on, Romans and then Muslims built in mud in Europe, Africa and the middle east – as did the peoples of the Indus civilizations ,Buddhist monks and Chinese emperors. During the middle ages, construction in unbaked mud was practiced not only in Europe, but in North America by the Indians, in Mexico by toltecs and the Aztecs, and in the Andes by the mochica. The architectural heritage of India is not only enormously rich but also extremely varied. Manifestations of this unique heritage can be seen in all their diversity in different regions off country. The classical and beautiful architecture of India has been well documented and saved, but the traditions are threatened by the new demands for change and development. And now, since the early fifties , Indian architecture has witnessed four particularly eventful decades. The fifties and sixties what dominated by the modern moment and buy internationalism, a movement which to any extent is still going strong, although the terminology is changing. The first studies of traditional and vernacular architecture started emerging during the early seventies. Initially, they were not only found up on but even called dead ends. However, they gained respect during the eighties. The last decade is also significant for two other developments which have touched architectural not the only in India, but through out the world. First of all, the scope of historic preservation has widened... It does now include the urban fabric and other historic preservation. Architects and public planners are finding that task engaging and in some ways, rewarding. Archaeology has expanded its horizons into the mud is perhaps the most commonly used building material, particularly in ancient traditional communities. The universal acceptance of mud is clear. Mind architecture is enriched by the diversities of expressions, due to the use of various techniques. Its compatibility with the regional surroundings where it is found, along with the local social and cultural overtones has given it many distinctions. In spite of the constant nature of mind has a material, it is used as a widely accepted natural source of CONSTRUCTION. This variety can be observed an as much in the lush green mounting regions of the North, as in the deserts of the west, and in other parts of the country To create a place to live, the interact with the environment while doing so and to give expression to their creative urges have been the most important of all human activities. The many fest form of a habitat expressed these ideas one and can be related to the cultural values and aspirations of a people. It is useful to examine a habitat in a specific space time context. The idea here is not to pass judgment on the status of civilization, but to understand a way of life. In spite of this Resource constraints and environmental problems, people build beautiful places. Even in situations where meagerness is a reality and the philosophy relationship with architecture. When people build, they create a habitat where the generative forces are, culture and context. While a culture is the sum total of human understanding, venues and accomplishments,’ context’ the represents the constraints and potential that the physical environment has to offer. These includes and the limitations and restrictions with which man has to live., indeed, a traditional habitat today is not the result off of one time effort what is the culmination of hundreds of years of understanding and response to a particular context. This articulation and consequence crystallization is the result of the negotiation between man and nature, between individual and the collective, between myth and science. It’s strongly reflects amongst other things. That you opened idea of private and shared. The most dominant of all human instincts. The Sky’s The Limit Could the first-even skyscraper have been built of unbaked mud?for that was undoubtedly the material out of which the ‘Tower of Babel’ was constructed in the 7th century BC in Babylon. Captain Robert Mignan recorded in 1829 that, ‘The remains of the Tower of Babel are composed of kiln-burnt and sun-dried bricks, rising irregularly to the height of 139 feet’. it is estimated that its seventh level once topped a height of 90 meters, and a number of other towns in ancient Mesopotamia contained vast, tiered towers or ‘ziggurates’, which were frequently about 40 to 50 meters high. These building traditions have been handled down through many centuries, and people still continue to use for the construction of towering edifices. |
Reference: http://seminarprojects.com/Thread-mud-architecture#ixzz2J2EyiTBY
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks to Ur Support